Re:text got cut~off...continued

Posted by Rich on December 03, 1997 at 19:00:49:

In Reply to: Re:text got cut~off...continued posted by Energia on December 03, 1997 at 17:22:10:

:
: (cont.)

: How does Eric speaking passionately on injustices contradict or relate to what I said about attacking non~Indians? For I to contradict myself, would be to say something & later say the opposite, which would be I didn't think you thought Eric wasn't attacking non~Indians.

NOWHERE, do I say, imply, think or otherwise imagine that Eric was attacking non-Indians. Could they possibly just be PEOPLE? You bring race in again, though thou doth protest too much that thy ain't! He is attacking SOMEONE (fellow cast, crew, production company?) Read the part where he talks about a reference!

Again, if Eric wasn't complaining about injustices to his race, than I brought the subject to the table. Yet in your defense of his statements, you say that he was ... therefore, logic tells me, based on your comments, that I was only responding to what was already there.

I by no means was attempting to slander or belittle the guy. I chose my words carefully and posed most of my commentary as questions. We put up the interview because we knew many would enjoy reading it ... we did not, however, want the impression given that we endorsed all of the content.

Follow Ups:

• Re:text Energia 21:19:27 12/03/97 (14)
  • Let it Rest! Rich 04:27:36 12/04/97 (13)
    • Re: .... Energia 08:40:22 12/04/97 (12)
      • Wow! Rich 12:27:00 12/04/97 (5)
        • Re: Wow! Energia 14:04:38 12/04/97 (4)
          • An Interview With Energia! Rich 17:23:05 12/04/97 (3)
            • Re: An Interview With Energia! Energia 17:56:02 12/04/97 (2)
              • Re: An Interview With Energia! Elaine 18:20:56 12/04/97 (0)
              • Re: An Interview With Energia! Elaine 18:20:13 12/04/97 (0)
      • Re: .... Bill Rooks 10:32:17 12/04/97 (5)
        • Re: .... Georgette 23:24:30 12/04/97 (0)
        • Re: .... Myrrh 12:00:07 12/04/97 (2)
          • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 15:05:26 12/04/97 (1)
            • Re: ..... Ad naseum Carin 18:23:25 12/04/97 (0)
        • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 12:00:03 12/04/97 (2)
          • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 15:05:26 12/04/97 (1)
            • Re: ..... Ad naseum Carin 18:23:25 12/04/97 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: : 
: : (cont.)

: : How does Eric speaking passionately on injustices contradict or relate to what I said about attacking non~Indians? For I to contradict myself, would be to say something & later say the opposite, which would be I didn't think you thought Eric wasn't attacking non~Indians.

: NOWHERE, do I say, imply, think or otherwise imagine that Eric was attacking non-Indians. Could they possibly just be PEOPLE? You bring race in again, though thou doth protest too much that thy ain't! He is attacking SOMEONE (fellow cast, crew, production company?) Read the part where he talks about a reference! 

: Again, if Eric wasn't complaining about injustices to his race, than I brought the subject to the table. Yet in your defense of his statements, you say that he was ... therefore, logic tells me, based on your comments, that I was only responding to what was already there.

: I by no means was attempting to slander or belittle the guy. I chose my words carefully and posed most of my commentary as questions. We put up the interview because we knew many would enjoy reading it ... we did not, however, want the impression given that we endorsed all of the content.


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: