Re:text got cut~off...continued

Posted by Energia on December 03, 1997 at 17:22:10:

In Reply to: Re: A Not So Brief Response...sorry *G* posted by Energia on December 03, 1997 at 16:49:29:

(cont.)

How does Eric speaking passionately on injustices contradict or relate to what I said about attacking non~Indians? For I to contradict myself, would be to say something & later say the opposite, which would be I didn't think you thought Eric wasn't attacking non~Indians.

No disrespect intended Rich *S*

Energia (crossing fingers & hoping she hasn't dug herself into a deeper hole *G*)
: -------------------------------

: : :
: Rich, I too hope for some kind of discourse. I'd
like to clear a few things: 1st, I never accused you
of interjecting your own feelings of racism into the
article, what I got from your commentary was what to
me sounded as if you felt Eric was attacking
non~Indians. What made it seem that way was what you
wrote here:

: "An anger at the people who made the film (Which I
didn't see anger, but frustration towards the films
producers, that I can agree on)"

: "and some of those cast in it" --- here is where I
felt that you were implying that Eric was attacking
non~Indians, for nowhere in the article did he bash
any of the actors. I read & re~read, but found
nothing to that affect. When Eric was asked: "How did
you get on with the rest of the cast?" he replied "I
got along with everybody". So, I felt that you were
adding things not in the article which were
contradicting & making Eric out to be Angry at
everyone in the movie, non~Indians who make movies on
Indians.

: It was never my intention to make it seem you had
"race" in mind, but that Eric was attacking
non~Indians in his comments on European film~makers,
your replies of what would it matter if the movie was
made by Europeans or Indians, but it does. The 2
movies Dances... & LOTM you pointed out are 2 movies
far & few in between to represent the vast & varied
culture of all Indian nations.

: 2nd when Eric spoke of the Six Nations, it

Follow Ups:

• Re:text got cut~off...continued Rich 19:00:49 12/03/97 (15)
  • Re:text Energia 21:19:27 12/03/97 (14)
    • Let it Rest! Rich 04:27:36 12/04/97 (13)
      • Re: .... Energia 08:40:22 12/04/97 (12)
        • Wow! Rich 12:27:00 12/04/97 (5)
          • Re: Wow! Energia 14:04:38 12/04/97 (4)
            • An Interview With Energia! Rich 17:23:05 12/04/97 (3)
              • Re: An Interview With Energia! Energia 17:56:02 12/04/97 (2)
                • Re: An Interview With Energia! Elaine 18:20:56 12/04/97 (0)
                • Re: An Interview With Energia! Elaine 18:20:13 12/04/97 (0)
        • Re: .... Bill Rooks 10:32:17 12/04/97 (5)
          • Re: .... Georgette 23:24:30 12/04/97 (0)
          • Re: .... Myrrh 12:00:07 12/04/97 (2)
            • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 15:05:26 12/04/97 (1)
              • Re: ..... Ad naseum Carin 18:23:25 12/04/97 (0)
          • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 12:00:03 12/04/97 (2)
            • Prelude to a point by point dissertation on what I really think about the Eric Schweig interview Elaine 15:05:26 12/04/97 (1)
              • Re: ..... Ad naseum Carin 18:23:25 12/04/97 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: 
: (cont.)

: How does Eric speaking passionately on injustices contradict or relate to what I said about attacking non~Indians? For I to contradict myself, would be to say something & later say the opposite, which would be I didn't think you thought Eric wasn't attacking non~Indians.

: No disrespect intended Rich *S* 

: Energia (crossing fingers & hoping she hasn't dug herself into a deeper hole *G*)
: : -------------------------------













: 
: : : : 
: : Rich, I too hope for some kind of discourse. I'd 
: like to clear a few things: 1st, I never accused you 
: of interjecting your own feelings of racism into the 
: article, what I got from your commentary was what to 
: me sounded as if you felt Eric was attacking 
: non~Indians. What made it seem that way was what you 
: wrote here:

: : "An anger at the people who made the film (Which I 
: didn't see anger, but frustration towards the films 
: producers, that I can agree on)"

: : "and some of those cast in it" --- here is where I 
: felt that you were implying that Eric was attacking 
: non~Indians, for nowhere in the article did he bash 
: any of the actors. I read & re~read, but found 
: nothing to that affect. When Eric was asked: "How did 
: you get on with the rest of the cast?" he replied "I 
: got along with everybody". So, I felt that you were 
: adding things not in the article which were 
: contradicting & making Eric out to be Angry at 
: everyone in the movie, non~Indians who make movies on 
: Indians. 

: : It was never my intention to make it seem you had 
: "race" in mind, but that Eric was attacking 
: non~Indians in his comments on European film~makers, 
: your replies of what would it matter if the movie was 
: made by Europeans or Indians, but it does. The 2 
: movies Dances... & LOTM you pointed out are 2 movies 
: far & few in between to represent the vast & varied 
: culture of all Indian nations.

: : 2nd when Eric spoke of the Six Nations, it


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: