Re: What do you mean, Custer's gay?

Posted by Nikki on April 12, 2000 at 04:52:46:

In Reply to: Stir things up! posted by Don on March 18, 2000 at 09:36:38:

Yes, I do think you're nuts. You're telling me that in all the
years of research and conjecture, nobody has found any evidence like this before? Why haven't I ever heard of you?

By the way, Mr. "deliver a paper at the University of North Dakota", you misspelled knowledgeable and vilify; heroicize is not a real word at all; and, in referring to "soldier" in your first assertion, it should read "one of whom..."; I guess command of the English language is not one of your strong points, huh?

Next you'll be claiming that Custer's horse had been secretly trained by Sitting Bull, and would not retreat upon command!

Follow Ups:

• Re: What do you mean, Custer's gay? frank bodden 22:46:45 5/03/2000 (5)
  • Re: What do you mean, Custer's gay? Linda Terrell 18:58:23 5/07/2000 (4)
    • Don's a troll Linda Terrell 08:52:51 5/15/2000 (1)
      • Re: Don's a troll Nikki 18:09:10 5/26/2000 (0)
    • Re: What do you mean, Custer's gay? Billy Bob 04:37:35 5/13/2000 (1)
      • Re: What do you mean, Custer's gay? adam 02:38:47 8/13/2001 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: Yes, I do think you're nuts.  You're telling me that in all the
: years of research and conjecture, nobody has found any evidence like this before?  Why haven't I ever heard of you?  

: By the way, Mr. "deliver a paper at the University of North Dakota", you misspelled knowledgeable and vilify; heroicize is not a real word at all; and, in referring to "soldier" in your first assertion, it should read "one of whom..."; I guess command of the English language is not one of your strong points, huh?

: Next you'll be claiming that Custer's horse had been secretly trained by Sitting Bull, and would not retreat upon command!


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: