Against All Odds Message Board
Against All Odds Message Board
11/22/2024 12:11:19 PM
Home | Old Board Archives | Events | Polls
Photo Album | Classifieds | Downloads
Profile | Register | Members | Private Messages | Search | Posting Tips | FAQ | Web Links | Chat
Bookmarks | Active Topics
Invite A Friend To Face The Odds!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Battle of the Little Bighorn - 1876
 Custer's Last Stand
 Benteen's order
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page

Author Previous Topic: Isandlwana/Isandlwhana Similiarities Topic Next Topic: The Charge of the Lght Brigade
Page: of 53

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  2:17:50 PM  Show Profile
St Pat's day greetings to all.
A little known fact.In 1848 the Choctaw Indians raised 700 dollars for famine relief in Ireland.That was about 70 times the amount Queen Vic donated.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Dark Cloud
Brigadier General


USA
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  2:49:21 PM  Show Profile  Visit Dark Cloud's Homepage
Little known because not true.

It was 1847, it was 170 dollars (several urls, here's a plug for a book about it http://www.kstrom.net/cgi-bin/amazon_products_feed_2.cgi?input_item=1883672910&input_search_type=AsinSearch&input_sort=++reviewrank), and the Queen alone donated from 2 to 5k or more pound sterling to Irish famine relief. Of course, the individual members of the family also gave or had donations made in their name. (lots of urls, here's one on the 2k level: http://home.att.net/~nolantravels/97ir11.html)

This doesn't make the donation any less generous, or the Saxe Coburgs and British government any less callous given their riches, but you have a tendency to grotesque and maudlin exaggeration (those damp eyes at the Crimea). You're unreliable with facts.

St. Patrick was the first known person to say slavery in and of itself was wrong as a concept and institution. Not just wrong because of who was the slave. Hail.

Dark Cloud
copyright RL MacLeod
darkcloud@darkendeavors.com
www.darkendeavors.com
www.boulderlout.com
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Heavyrunner
Captain


USA
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  3:13:13 PM  Show Profile
wILD,

As you probably know, by beginning of the 20th century, more natural born Irish lived in the United States than in Ireland, a trail of tears in its own right that began with the potato famine.

A sad loss for Ireland, but I hate to think of all that America would have missed without the Irish.

And, we're a nation of Irishmen today....I hope you're drowning the Shamrock a bit... Erin go Bragh!

Bob Bostwick
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

movingrobewoman
Lt. Colonel


USA
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  3:17:36 PM  Show Profile  Send movingrobewoman a Yahoo! Message
quote:
Originally posted by wILD I

St Pat's day greetings to all.
A little known fact.In 1848 the Choctaw Indians raised 700 dollars for famine relief in Ireland.That was about 70 times the amount Queen Vic donated.



Happy Saint Patrick's day back! Did you know that nobody knows what the heck green beer is in deepest Arkansas?

Stike up the band with a rousing rendition of "Garryowen!"

movingrobe
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  5:05:03 PM  Show Profile
Thanks MRW and Heavyrunner.
As everyone can see our resident curmudgeon never misses a chance.DC glad to see that you chase up my every word but if you want to correct me then do a little more research ,my sources indicate 710$.
But my "maudlin" point was that these "bunch of aborigines"had the generosity to make a gesture to assist a starving people while Queen Vic presided over a government who saw the famine as no more that an economic adjustment.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

hunkpapa7
Lieutenant

United Kingdom
Status: offline

Posted - March 17 2005 :  6:38:51 PM  Show Profile
Wild,
make sure you have a few pints of the Black Magic.
Hail glourious St Patrick,the lord of our Isle.

wev'e caught them napping boys
Aye Right !
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - April 21 2005 :  9:08:13 PM  Show Profile
I do not propose to be an expert on military law and, have never claimed to be such. With that disclaimer out of the way I will, however, rely on my personal experience in military and para-military organizations to comment upon the elements that constitute a "Direct Order."

In my mind, a direct order must have, at a minimum, two elements to constitute legitimacy; authority and legality. One must have the authority to issue a "direct order" and, the legal right to enforce it. In other words, the order must be directed from a superior, in an established hierarchy, to one of lesser rank within the same hierarchy. The order may be be written or oral.

Authority is established by position/rank in the corporation. Legitimacy is granted by(via organizational agreement),charter, rules, regulations etc.,establishing an irrefutable right to issue command. This is a necessary provision. Try to imagine an organization/Army/Navy/ Air Force were subordinates were giving the option to obey or disobey.

There is no provision made regarding the difficulty in adhering to the command/order. One either obeys or dis-obeys.

Example: Addressee- Rank and name (or simply a name)

"The commanding officer wishes you to come as quickly as possible and feasible. Your presence is required. However, if the going is to dangerous, to long, impeded by the enemy or, just inconvenient, you need not comply."

Benteen's choice to respond and stay with Reno, his superior, has been proffered by some as a legitimate alternative to compliance with his order. Yet, the same individuals unanimously agree that Reno lost control of his command and, was sharply ineffective as a leader.

Should not Benteen,the true leader at this point,attempt to comply with his written order?

Hindsight is twenty twenty and, armed with information that the soldiers did not possess, it is so easy for all of us to lay back in our easy chairs and make decisions. We will never know if a concerted charge of several hundred, mounted Calvary men may have broken the ring of Indian braves thus saving, at least, a portion of Custer's command. In all probability,no effort would have gained victory, but more lives may have been saved. I fully admit the distinct possibility that I may have crawled in the nearest hole and shuddered like a new born babe without its blanket. That, however, is not the issue. We will never know what may have happened because no attempt to follow the order "Come Quick" was attempted.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Little White Dove
Private

Status: offline

Posted - April 22 2005 :  01:21:35 AM  Show Profile
Hi everyone. I hope that I am not interfering with anything too important. If I am i'm sorry.

If it's not too much trouble. I would like to ask a question about Benteen's orders, and of course his response to those orders. Both verbally and in deed.

Much of what I have read indicates that he may not have been able to respond as quickly as thought. Some say that because of the difficult terrain, animal fatigue and the heat that it was physically impossible to arrive in time to help Custer. I don't know, I'm just asking, okay? Anyway, if these are a possible answers. And considering Benteen's reply to the orders. And please forgive me. I think it was something like this. "How does he (Custer) expect me to do that?" Do you feel that Benteen did disobey orders? And if he did, why?

Edited by - Little White Dove on April 22 2005 01:23:24 AM
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 22 2005 :  09:15:54 AM  Show Profile
Much of what I have read indicates that he may not have been able to respond as quickly as thought.
Custer was dead by the time the packs arrived at Reno's position.The orders Benteen recieved were redundant very soon after Martin arrived with them.
Might be no harm to read back over some of the older posts.You will get some understanding of the predicament Benteen found himself in.
Welcome and regards [don't mind Warlord his bark is worse than his bite]
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 22 2005 :  5:42:01 PM  Show Profile
wILDI; As I recall reading, did not Weir make his sally forth to Weir Point after the pack train arrived at Reno's entrenchment? He then is supposed to have witnessed the very end of the battleWell its 3 miles from Weir point to LSH.What he saw was a lot of dust being raised as a lot of dead meat was being chopped up.

I believe some mention hearing shooting after the packtrain arrived.
Well they carried out tests and shots could not be heard from Reno's position.But even so Custer's boys had 124 rounds on them .Now deduct approx 200 rounds [troops saving the first round for themselves]and that leaves approx 23000 rounds and spanking new carbines not to mention the officers sporting rifles.Enough to keeps the boys entertained for an hour or two.

I suggest you start attaching more verification, before you act to be tutor
I know, I know.I keep forgetting how pickey you are about verification.Now where's me Spencer till I stop a Pickett or two.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - April 22 2005 :  10:01:28 PM  Show Profile
All witnesses, even those who did not agree with each other, agreed that the sound of firing was heard for over an hour after the pack train arrived at Reno's position. How then could Custer and his men be dead? Please don't force me to research for specific times and post them. It's true.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 23 2005 :  07:48:21 AM  Show Profile
you have a very old and corrupt monarchy/democracy! Your queen looks mummified, and the prince of whales and duchess of cornwole appear to be the worst degenerates I have seen recently! Unbelievable, that Diana put up with that mess as long as she did!
Just a quick reply.I will get back to you later.
Well ya got one thing right there Warlord Diana was a Spencer.
Perhaps a little geopolitical lesson is called for.Can anyone help Warlord out of his predicament?


Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

hunkpapa7
Lieutenant

United Kingdom
Status: offline

Posted - April 23 2005 :  2:59:20 PM  Show Profile
Extra Extra read all about it, 23/4/2005.somewhere south/east of Dublin.

Christopher what's his name,discovers Eire for Queen Bessie,on thrusting HRH royal flag in the peeble beach was heard murmuring,"is this America"I have always wanted to go there !
Great Britain will now have a public holiday to mark this occasion.

Yes Diana was a true Spencer,when she didn't work properly,she got a poke to fix the problem.
Of course she was no stranger to the Cavalry,especially the House Hold.

The mummified Queen,or the stupid President ?
She ain't much fun,whereas he is hilarious !
I would have neither.

wev'e caught them napping boys
Aye Right !
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 23 2005 :  4:14:09 PM  Show Profile
Naughty Naughty Hunkpappa.

All witnesses, even those who did not agree with each other, agreed that the sound of firing was heard for over an hour after the pack train arrived at Reno's position.
Well there was 20000 rounds or there abouts of surplus ammo lying about.And there was a party going on and everyone wanted a "slice"of the action.So I'd be very surprised if the firing did not last well into the night.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - April 24 2005 :  4:04:50 PM  Show Profile
[quote]Originally posted by Little White Dove

Hi everyone. I hope that I am not interfering with anything too important. If I am i'm sorry.

If it's not too much trouble. I would like to ask a question about Benteen's orders, and of course his response to those orders. Both verbally and in deed.

Much of what I have read indicates that he may not have been able to respond as quickly as thought. Some say that because of the difficult terrain, animal fatigue and the heat that it was physically impossible to arrive in time to help Custer. I don't know, I'm just asking, okay? Anyway, if these are a possible answers. And considering Benteen's reply to the orders. And please forgive me. I think it was something like this. "How does he (Custer) expect me to do that?" Do you feel that Benteen did disobey orders? And if he did, why?



The specific order was "Come", "quickly" was the manner in which he was expected to respond to that order. He did neither.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 24 2005 :  5:55:37 PM  Show Profile
The specific order was "Come", "quickly" was the manner in which he was expected to respond to that order. He did neither
A minor point Joe but I know how you and DC fancy yourselves as wordsmiths.Quickly is an adverb this side of the pond.So the use of "neither"is incorrect.
Now if you had said [as was the case]the specific order was "come quick and bring the packs" then you could have said he did neither.In which case you would have been wrong.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - April 24 2005 :  7:08:47 PM  Show Profile
The sequence was as follows "Benteen,Come On", the second portion was "Be Quick", which was followed by "Bring packs." He didn't "Come", he wasn't "quick" about anything, and he didn't "Bring Packs" to Custer. You are right, quickly is an adverb here too. After all, you guys were our mentors.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 25 2005 :  04:07:41 AM  Show Profile
Joe
I don't want to do you an injustice but I think you give Custer the benifit of the doubt as regards the orders he got from Terry but you won't extend this benifit to Benteen who was in a much more precarious situation.
Custer was in control of the situation and could have adhered to Terry's wishes.There was no pressure of time to have forced him to act as he did.His decision was taken coldly and deliberately.Benteen on the other hand was not in control of the situation.
Go valley hunting but for how long?Come quickly but bring the packs.2/IC of regiment begging for help.Where is Custer?Weir rides off.What a mess no one in charge. Ammo needed urgently.Stabilize Reno's position and then follow Weir.
If the benifit of the doubt is to be extended to anyone then it should be to Benteen.The conditions under which he had to make decisions alone would justify it.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Dark Cloud
Brigadier General


USA
Status: offline

Posted - April 26 2005 :  09:48:42 AM  Show Profile  Visit Dark Cloud's Homepage
Wild,

I agree, for what that is worth.

You may recall my longtime mantra: construct a standard of conduct for which to judge actions in the battle - virtually any standard - and hold the top three officers to the same standards. Custer loses every time. The standards that Custerphiles apply to their hero have to change from the Yellowstone to LSH for him to come out on top, but they won't allow that for Reno and Benteen. An initial example is how Custer's reasons for leaving the suggested route and following the trail across the Wolf Mt.'s is an energetic, far sighted decision, whereas Reno doing much the same of his previous scout is a stupid failure, although Reno obtained useful info and he did nothing rash. Custer is mandated to be judged by a different standard, and it doesn't hold water.

Dark Cloud
copyright RL MacLeod
darkcloud@darkendeavors.com
www.darkendeavors.com
www.boulderlout.com
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Heavyrunner
Captain


USA
Status: offline

Posted - April 26 2005 :  12:41:32 PM  Show Profile
Wasn't the order, "be quick, bring packs?" Forgive me, it's been a while since I read it.


Bob Bostwick
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - April 26 2005 :  8:17:54 PM  Show Profile
quote:
Originally posted by wILD I

Joe
I don't want to do you an injustice but I think you give Custer the benefit of the doubt as regards the orders he got from Terry but you won't extend this benefit to Benteen who was in a much more precarious situation.


Wild, you could never do me an injustice because you disagree with me. You are a gentleman and possess a distinguished ability to understand the need to be civil with one another on this forum. Every thread you have posted has been even, comprehensible, and worthy. Your stability counters my propensity to get carried away at times. I appreciate your candid perspective of my perspective. You have afforded me an opportunity to espound further upon my position and, I hope, given me an additional chance to clarify my perspective regarding Benteen.

Custer operated under the orders of General Terry who was a competent lawyer. Have you ever know a lawyer who did not have a immense command of the English language? Yet, his orders were ambiguous. Every reputable scholar agrees that the fantastic "leeway" was afforded Custer. The reasons, I'm sure, are many. When the columns set out, no one knew the exact position of the hostiles. No one was certain of their strength. Everyone, who counted, was convinced that the hostiles would flee at the first approach of the military. Under such circumstances, perhaps, discretion in orders was appropriate.

However, Custer's "order" to Benteen,unlike the circumstances that helped to formulate Terry's orders, was based on hard, cold, and substantiated facts: "We have found the village, it is large, reports sent from Reno indicate the hostiles are making a stand, we have thousands of non-combatants fleeing north, there is no need to keep the ammunition (protected) in the rear, bring it now."



Custer was in control of the situation and could have adhered to Terry's wishes.There was no pressure of time to have forced him to act as he did.His decision was taken coldly and deliberately.Benteen on the other hand was not in control of the situation.


You are absolutely correct when you say there was no pressure of time to force his actions. Time was irrelevant. It was action, action on behalf of the village that appeared to be on "the jump", running away
that prompted Custer to do what he did. From the moment that his scout, Girard shouted, (and I paraphrase),"there go your Indians General, running like the Devil" followed by Custer's observation of a huge,dust cloud bellowing in the distance, the General was convinced that the Indians were running for their lives.

Today Wild, you and I know that he was in error, the Indians were not running away. Custer had no way of knowing this at that critical moment in time.


Go valley hunting but for how long?


Benteen wrote a letter to his wife several days after the battle. In the letter he explained that he was to seek "THE" valley, not "a" valley. "The" (a direct article) denotes a specific location as opposed to "A", an indefinite article, which could be anywhere. The valley Benteen was to scout was the southern end of the very same valley Custer was approaching. Custer feared an escape route to his "left." Benteen's Lt., Gibson, understood this order exactly and, said as much in a letter he too wrote. Only after three years of accusations of malfeasance of duty did Benteen resort to what is commonly referred to as "Benteeisms" or mis-information.


Come quickly but bring the packs.2/IC of regiment begging for help.Where is Custer?



Benteen's command easily followed Custer's trail by following the torn and disrupted earth deposited by the hooves of the iron-shod steed of Custer's command. He simply stopped short. This was the same trail the Weir picked up later as he moved to ward's Custer's command until he was stopped by the charging hostiles.

I have been repeatedly charged with "demonizing" Benteen. As a result, I can only assume, I have been relegated to the obvious perineum of a "Custerphile" by certain parties. The only problem I have with Benteen is that he lied. His statements at the Reno Inquiry were patently false and, he knew it. Why he lied is the subject of another thread.
No Wild, you could never do me an injustice because I respect you. Your agreement or disagreement with my philosophies are irrelevant. if others followed your example( including me)so much more could be accomplished on this wonderful forum.






Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 27 2005 :  5:59:06 PM  Show Profile
Joe
Many thanks for a most civil post.
Ihad put together a fairly comprensive reply but somehow or other lost it.So you will have to make do with one or two main points.

Martin took 18 minutes to cover the distance from Reno area to Benteen.Benteen took 22 minutes to cover very much the same distance.Martin was a lone galloper so would cover ground a little faster than 3 troops.So no reason to accuse Benteen of being tardy.

All documents both before and after mention both Gibbon and Custer cooperating.Timing was everything.When Custer reached the trail he decided to follow it against Terry's wishes why?
Custer was in command of the 7th because Terry endorsed his begging letter.Nice way Custer had of paying him back.

Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

prolar
Major


Status: offline

Posted - April 27 2005 :  9:29:08 PM  Show Profile
Wild I: Please excuse my butting in, but you have made this claim before and I have never seen anything to back it up. Where is there any mention of cooperating made before the disaster? In his report to Sheridan on the 21st, Terry finishes with " I only hope one of the two columns will find the Indians." Where is the combined attack?
Benteen left the morass 20 minutes ahead of the pack train. Hare was able to ride to the train to speed the ammo and return in 20 minutes. This tells me that Benteen travelled at pack train speed and that is slow.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 28 2005 :  04:26:12 AM  Show Profile
Wild I: Please excuse my butting in, but you have made this claim before and I have never seen anything to back it up
You're more than welcome Prolar.
I make the claim based on Terry's orders and the reports of both Terry and Gibbon [Gibbon being a neutral observer in this with no axe to grind] and circumstantial evidence.
Terry's orders to Custer outline the movements of Gibbon and his intention of attempting to inclose the Indians between his two forces.
Terry's report [ok after the event but if we dismiss it we must regard Terry as a lier]which contains this "The movements proposed for Genl Gibbon's column were carried out to the letter and had the attack been deferred until it was up I cannot doubt that we would have been successful".
Gibbon's letter to Ruggles states "and as Lt Col Custer had the shorter line over which to operate the department commander strongly impressed upon him the propriety of not pressing his march too rapidly.Now is Gibbons also lying?
Without going into too much detail on military tactics what is the point of sending two columns against an enemy of unknown strenght without having them cooperate?
No where is there a shred of evidence to suggest that the plan agreed by the Terry and the column commanders called for the forces to act independently.

In his report to Sheridan on the 21st, Terry finishes with " I only hope one of the two columns will find the Indians." Where is the combined attack?
How does it exclude cooperation?Two columns approaching from different directions one was going to discover the Indians first.Terry orders to Custer do mention the sending of a scout to Gibbons with information on the results of his discovery along Tullock Creek.A further indication that cooperation was intended.

Benteen left the morass 20 minutes ahead of the pack train. Hare was able to ride to the train to speed the ammo and return in 20 minutes. This tells me that Benteen travelled at pack train speed and that is slow.
Hare did not travel with the ammo so I don't think that point stands up.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

wILD I
Brigadier General


Ireland
Status: offline

Posted - April 28 2005 :  10:28:23 AM  Show Profile
Further.The plan agreed by the 3 commanders was to attempt to catch the Indians between two converging columns.Custer by directly following the trail put this plan in jeopardy.If the Indians had turned South when they had reached the BH River it would have put their village beyond the closing pincers of Custer and Gibbon.The only way to have ensured that this would not have happened was for Custer to have followed his instructions and to have continued futher South before crossing.
Custer disregarded the timing of the plan and also the intended strategy.I think he was a treacherious asshole and I'm not given to such terminology but in Custer's case I 'll make an exception.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page
Page: of 53 Previous Topic: Isandlwana/Isandlwhana Similiarities Topic Next Topic: The Charge of the Lght Brigade  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:
 
Custom Search

Against All Odds Message Board © 1998-2010 Rich Federici/Mohican Press Go To Top Of Page
This page was raised in 0.15 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.03