Author |
Topic |
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 03:08:29 AM
|
I agree with the guy, His family is slaughtered by the English, they kill his kids and his wife remarries,.if he's telling the truth, I dont blame him and think he was doing the least he could. Id do the same the thing. He also said he was enslaved by the mohawks, Poor fella had a hard time with the white man and then the injuns make him a slave to boot. The story could have made (purposely or unpurposely) Magua into a hero had a few things been changed slightly.
|
report to moderator
|
|
Irishgirl
Council of Elders
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: February 14 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 22 2007 : 08:59:19 AM
|
You make a good point. He had every right to do what he did in the name of "revenge". |
IG |
report to moderator |
|
Kirachi
Colonial Settler
United Kingdom
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 04 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 09:56:59 AM
|
That's true but he went a little far in trying to kill innocent girls. I can understand him wanting to kill their father but it seems a little obsessive and unhinged to try and kill two young girls that have never hurt him in anyway other than who their father is. You can't help who your family is.
|
report to moderator |
|
Irishgirl
Council of Elders
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: February 14 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 22 2007 : 10:04:07 AM
|
Well their father had Magua's little children killed so Magua looked at it like he should "return the favor" I suppose. |
IG |
report to moderator |
|
Kirachi
Colonial Settler
United Kingdom
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 04 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 10:10:32 AM
|
Hmm yes, but two wrongs don't make a right. I agree with revenge for your loved ones up to a point, in that the people that wronged you should pay the price but inncoents shouldn't. Otherwise you are no better, if not worse, than the person that wronged you. |
report to moderator |
|
Ridgerunner
Pathfinder
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: November 12 2006
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 10:46:49 AM
|
That was the Indian's way of war...He would have killed them with or without the background of personal vengance. |
report to moderator |
|
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 12:12:59 PM
|
The English killed his kids and ruined his whole existence, so Magua wanted to wipe the earth of the grey hairs seed to keep them from reproducing on all fronts. The girls arent innocent entirely, they are in a war zone and are thus are part of the "playing field." They shoulda stayed in england till the english had a firmer grip on the us territory anyway. I would say family memebers are off limits in a war of that type, but the english killed his kids so |
report to moderator |
|
winglo
Deerslayer
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 13 2007
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 22 2007 : 1:12:02 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Ridgerunner
That was the Indian's way of war...He would have killed them with or without the background of personal vengance.
What happened to the idea of taking them as prisoners and raising them as part of his own tribe or marrying them to replace his lost family? I thought that was a practice of many 18th century Indians. In the end, that's what he was ordered to do with Alice by Sachem. |
report to moderator |
|
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 5:56:49 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by winglo
quote: Originally posted by Ridgerunner
That was the Indian's way of war...He would have killed them with or without the background of personal vengance.
What happened to the idea of taking them as prisoners and raising them as part of his own tribe or marrying them to replace his lost family? I thought that was a practice of many 18th century Indians. In the end, that's what he was ordered to do with Alice by Sachem.
One could meet a worse fate than being forced to have kids with alice and marrying her too hehe |
report to moderator |
|
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 22 2007 : 10:15:46 PM
|
Besides Maguas being a somewhat noble character in his own right, the British are portrayed as pretty horrible people, then they are sparred total embarressment when the Major gives his life in exchange for either coras or hawkeyes, the french general, who was historically a admirable person, was portrayed as such , aside from his giving Magua a freeforall on the retreating british. But who can blame either of them for that? |
report to moderator |
|
Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: August 16 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 22 2007 : 10:49:03 PM
|
The Redcoats were pretty bad...who know how many times they attempted "ethnic cleansing" by giving the tribes smallpox infected blankets, for example? And let's not forget how they turned Acadia into Nova Scotia...
And Montcalm? Like all the other European officers (French and British), he had very little use for "Les Sauvages" or the colonists, either. I will admit that he was considerably more honorable than Wolfe. |
report to moderator |
|
Fitzhugh Williams
Mohicanland Statesman
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 17 2005
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 12:24:17 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by Obediah I will admit that he was considerably more honorable than Wolfe.
Wolfe treated his own officers like dirt and was roundly hated by them. I often wondered which direction the bullet came from that killed him. The "Death of Wolfe" painting is pure fantasy. |
"Les deux pieds contre la muraille et la tete sous le robinet" |
report to moderator |
|
Ridgerunner
Pathfinder
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: November 12 2006
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 02:22:27 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by Obediah
...And Montcalm? Like all the other European officers (French and British), he had very little use for "Les Sauvages" or the colonists, either. I will admit that he was considerably more honorable than Wolfe.
I do not believe this is true of Montcalm.I've read that Montcalm had a very close friendship with one of the top Indian leaders.(Pontiac?)
As for British "ethnic cleansing"-I never cared much for the British but Indians also practced "ethnic cleansing" The Iroquois league had completely wiped out the Erie tribe,hunted them down till every last Erie man,woman and child was dead. |
report to moderator |
|
Kirachi
Colonial Settler
United Kingdom
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 04 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 05:40:18 AM
|
quote: [i] I never cared much for the British
careful there |
report to moderator |
|
RedFraggle
Mohicanite
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 13 2006
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 09:10:28 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by Kirachi
quote: I never cared much for the British
careful there
LOL, Kirachi.
And now I'll put on my "Cooper fan" hat. (Nerd alert, for anyone who wants to scroll past this post. ) It's interesting that the screenwriters for LOTM made Magua's hatred of the "grey hair" more compelling than in Cooper's novel. In the movie, Magua acts in part to avenge his murdered children and the loss of his wife, but in the book he acts to avenge a personal affront: he gets drunk in the English camp and Munro has him tied to a stake and whipped. The shame of it is so great that Magua cannot go back to his own people and holds an eternal grudge against the English.
For once, I think the movie version of Magua is more of a compelling bad guy than the one in the novel. I don't think I'd any special feelings for the grey hair either if he was responsible for killing my family! |
report to moderator |
|
Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: August 16 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 23 2007 : 12:11:57 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Kirachi
quote:
I never cared much for the British
careful there
Well, as Matthew Quigley tells Lieutenant...er...Major Ashley-Pitt, "We already run the misfits outta our country; we sent 'em back to England."
Hope that's careful enough... |
report to moderator |
|
Kirachi
Colonial Settler
United Kingdom
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 04 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 2:09:41 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Obediah
quote: Originally posted by Kirachi
quote:
I never cared much for the British
careful there
Well, as Matthew Quigley tells Lieutenant...er...Major Ashley-Pitt, "We already run the misfits outta our country; we sent 'em back to England."
Hope that's careful enough...
Cheeky! |
report to moderator |
|
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 23 2007 : 3:16:42 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by RedFraggle
quote: Originally posted by Kirachi
quote: I never cared much for the British
careful there
LOL, Kirachi.
And now I'll put on my "Cooper fan" hat. (Nerd alert, for anyone who wants to scroll past this post. ) It's interesting that the screenwriters for LOTM made Magua's hatred of the "grey hair" more compelling than in Cooper's novel. In the movie, Magua acts in part to avenge his murdered children and the loss of his wife, but in the book he acts to avenge a personal affront: he gets drunk in the English camp and Munro has him tied to a stake and whipped. The shame of it is so great that Magua cannot go back to his own people and holds an eternal grudge against the English.
For once, I think the movie version of Magua is more of a compelling bad guy than the one in the novel. I don't think I'd any special feelings for the grey hair either if he was responsible for killing my family!
Likewise, Hawkeye is tar'd and feathered by the colonial militia, at least in real life, and dissappears forever. From what ive read of it, not much really |
report to moderator |
|
Light of the Moon
Mohicanland Statesman
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: December 18 2004
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 24 2007 : 12:30:30 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by MaguasBastardChild
The English killed his kids and ruined his whole existence, so Magua wanted to wipe the earth of the grey hairs seed to keep them from reproducing on all fronts. The girls arent innocent entirely, they are in a war zone and are thus are part of the "playing field." They shoulda stayed in england till the english had a firmer grip on the us territory anyway. I would say family memebers are off limits in a war of that type, but the english killed his kids so
Good point. But you're forgetting that it was Magua who helped put them there. Remember at the fort when Col. Monroe asked his daughters why they had disobeyed him and not stayed away like he had told them to do in his letter.
Magua happened upon that letter one way or another, used the info to set him right dead smack in their presence as a guide sent from the scotsman.
But he is entitled to revenge and I would have gone after the man too had he killed my daughters but don't think I would take out revenge on the rest of his family. Just speaking MOHO.
However, the natives were not that way. When blood vengance was carried out for something as devestating it was an eye for an eye. You took my kids, I'll take yours and then I'll take you for their murders.
|
I live in my own little world - but that's okay, they know me here! |
report to moderator |
|
Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: August 16 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 24 2007 : 11:13:27 AM
|
quote: Originally posted by Ridgerunner
.....
I do not believe this is true of Montcalm.I've read that Montcalm had a very close friendship with one of the top Indian leaders.(Pontiac?)
.....
Here we'll have to agree to disagree, I guess. The following quote comes from pg. 151 of Crucible of War, by Fred Anderson:
quote: As almost any conventionally minded European regular officer would have, Montcalm disliked departures from what he understood to be civilized standards of military conduct. He distrusted Indians, who operated according to their own understandings of warfare and could not be subjected to military discipline. Because Indians fought to gain prisoners, trophies, and booty, they could be ungovernable in the aftermath of a battle and were particularly prone to what Montcalm could only understand as acts of savagery—scalping, torture, even cannibalism. But most important, to use Indians seemed futile to Montcalm because no matter how many small victories they might win, they could inflict no lasting defeat on the British: once a battle had been won, they would simply take their captives and loot and return home. So far as Montcalm could see, the Canadian militia and even the troupes de la marine were only marginally preferable to the Indians, since whatever their skills in woodcraft, neither could compare with properly disciplined European troops in reliability under fire or staying power.
|
report to moderator |
|
Fitzhugh Williams
Mohicanland Statesman
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 17 2005
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 24 2007 : 3:23:52 PM
|
Here is were Montcalm and Vaudreuil came into disagreement. Supporters of Montcalm have long claimed that Vaudreuil was working against him and that this ultimately contributed to France's defeat. Vaudreuil wanted to use the milice and the Troupes de la Marine in the type of warfare they understood and practiced, while Montcalm tried to force them into the European mode, and even formed regiments of the Troupes de la Marine and used milice to replace losses in the Troupes de Terre. Supporters of Vaudreuil say that if the Canadiens had been used properly the outcome would have been different. They also say that if Langlade had been allowed to utilize the milice as he wanted at Quebec, the Plains of Abraham would never have been fought. |
"Les deux pieds contre la muraille et la tete sous le robinet" |
report to moderator |
|
Obediah
Mohicanland Statesman
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: August 16 2006
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 24 2007 : 4:16:29 PM
|
Anderson calls Montcalm's and Vaudreuil's conflicting strategies "mutually exclusive." What an understatement! Montcalm won this "battle" but certainly lost the war (and his life)! Vaudreuil's plan certainly couldn't done any worse...
Another quote from Crucible of War...
quote: But the marquis de Montcalm had aggravated the situation, and accelerated the failure of the alliances, by seeking to command the Indians as auxiliaries, rather than to negotiate for their cooperation as allies. Eventually the combined effects of poor supply and Montcalm’s Europeanized command alienated even the converted Indians and the habitants, so that in 1760 the chevalier de Levis and his regulars stood alone, abandoned by the peoples they had crossed the Atlantic to defend. [pg. 454]
|
report to moderator |
|
winglo
Deerslayer
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 13 2007
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 24 2007 : 5:40:53 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Light of the Moon
Good point. But you're forgetting that it was Magua who helped put them there. Remember at the fort when Col. Monroe asked his daughters why they had disobeyed him and not stayed away like he had told them to do in his letter.
Magua happened upon that letter one way or another, used the info to set him right dead smack in their presence as a guide sent from the scotsman.
But he is entitled to revenge and I would have gone after the man too had he killed my daughters but don't think I would take out revenge on the rest of his family. Just speaking MOHO.
However, the natives were not that way. When blood vengance was carried out for something as devestating it was an eye for an eye. You took my kids, I'll take yours and then I'll take you for their murders.
Excellent points, Light. Especially about the girls being drawn into the war by Magua's deception.
Regarding vengeance, there is always the option of giving grace and rising above what those who hurt and destroy your life have done to you. That is, not stooping to the low level of your enemy or allowing him or her to make a victim of you. But, you're right. From what little I know that certainly doesn't seem to have been the way Indians interacted with each other in the 18th century. |
report to moderator |
|
MaguasBastardChild
Pathfinder
Warning:
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: October 18 2007
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 24 2007 : 6:19:32 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by winglo
quote: Originally posted by Light of the Moon
Good point. But you're forgetting that it was Magua who helped put them there. Remember at the fort when Col. Monroe asked his daughters why they had disobeyed him and not stayed away like he had told them to do in his letter.
Magua happened upon that letter one way or another, used the info to set him right dead smack in their presence as a guide sent from the scotsman.
But he is entitled to revenge and I would have gone after the man too had he killed my daughters but don't think I would take out revenge on the rest of his family. Just speaking MOHO.
However, the natives were not that way. When blood vengance was carried out for something as devestating it was an eye for an eye. You took my kids, I'll take yours and then I'll take you for their murders.
Excellent points, Light. Especially about the girls being drawn into the war by Magua's deception.
I thought they were coming anyway, but just didnt get the messege from their dad NOT to come. |
report to moderator |
|
winglo
Deerslayer
USA
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 13 2007
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - October 24 2007 : 7:20:29 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by MaguasBastardChild
I thought they were coming anyway, but just didnt get the messege from their dad NOT to come.
If you remember, their father, Col. Monro, sent a message to them at Albany telling them not to come to the fort because of the French attacking it. When they arrive at the fort, we see the scene where he is surprised because he had sent 3 couriers with a message telling them not to come. Cora then informs him that "there was no message." Duncan informs Col. Monro that Magua led them into the ambush on the George Rd.
Later we learn from Magua, as he is talking to Gen. Montcalm, that he got rid of the other couriers. So, it is my understanding the Magua killed the other couriers (he may or may not have been one of the original 3), arrived at Albany, passed himself off as someone sent by Col. Monro to lead his daughters and Duncan to Fort William Henry. So the girls would not have even left Albany, if Magua hadn't done away with the original message and couriers. |
report to moderator |
|
Fitzhugh Williams
Mohicanland Statesman
Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 17 2005
Status: offline
|
Posted - October 24 2007 : 8:22:25 PM
|
quote: Originally posted by Obediah
Vaudreuil's plan certainly couldn't done any worse...
Then there's the story that been going around for about 248 years. The guards were withdrawn from the area around l'Anse au Foulon by order of Vaudreuil and his crony, Vergor (also a crony of Bigot), was placed in charge of its defense. Wolfe, after months of scouting the area, all of a sudden and without informing any of his subordinates, decides to attack there. It has the smell of treason. There were those who had rather have seen New France fall than be preserved. Bigot have been cheating the King (and anyone else he could) for some years and was about to be brought to task for it. He was tried, but acquitted for lack of evidence. Of course the evidence was lost with New France.
Wolfe had been unable to make any dent in Montcalm's fortifications and had squandered many good men trying. The situation was to the point where the Admiralty wound be forced to withdraw the fleet before the ice set in, and Wolfe, now in bad health, would probably not have survived the voyage home. Montcalm would have then been free to turn his attention to Amhearst, and we can only speculate what the outcome would have been. Certainly Montcalm hated Bigot and would certainly have provided any evidence he could agains him. So the final outcome was much to Bigot's benefit. |
"Les deux pieds contre la muraille et la tete sous le robinet" |
report to moderator |
|
Topic |
|