![The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!] The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!]](images/wwwboard.gif) |
|
| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
Lainey
TGAT
    

USA

Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: May 18 2002
Status: offline
Administrator |
Posted - January 19 2004 : 12:21:26 AM
|
I guess I'm not entirely nuts .... came across this article this evening & thought it uncanny timing. Please read - especially between the lines. O, Brave New World! Oh, those pesky little ethical questions.
quote: BRAVE NEW BABIESBy Claudia KalbJan. 26 issue -
Sharla Miller of Gillette, Wyo., always wanted a baby girl, but the odds seemed stacked against her. Her husband, Shane, is one of three brothers, and Sharla and her five siblings (four girls, two boys) have produced twice as many males as females. After the Millers' first son, Anthony, was born in 1991, along came Ashton, now 8, and Alec, 4. Each one was a gift, says Sharla, but the desire for a girl never waned. "I'm best friends with my mother," she says. "I couldn't get it out of my mind that I wanted a daughter." Two years ago Sharla, who had her fallopian tubes tied after Alec's birth, began looking into adopting a baby girl. In the course of her Internet research, she stumbled upon a Web site for the Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles, headed by Dr. Jeffrey Steinberg, where she learned about an in vitro fertilization technique called preimplantation genetic diagnosis. By creating embryos outside the womb, then testing them for gender, PGD could guarantee—with almost 100 percent certainty—the sex of her baby. Price tag: $18,480, plus travel. Last November Sharla's eggs and Shane's sperm were mixed in a lab dish, producing 14 healthy embryos, seven male and seven female. Steinberg transferred three of the females into Sharla's uterus, where two implanted successfully. If all goes well, the run of Miller boys will end in July with the arrival of twin baby girls. "I have three wonderful boys," says Sharla, "but since there was a chance I could have a daughter, why not?"
The brave new world is definitely here. After 25 years of staggering advances in reproductive medicine—first test-tube babies, then donor eggs and surrogate mothers—technology is changing baby-making in a whole new way. No longer can science simply help couples have babies, it can help them have the kind of babies they want. Choosing gender may obliterate one of the fundamental mysteries of procreation, but for people who have grown accustomed to taking 3-D ultrasounds of fetuses, learning a baby's sex within weeks of conception and scheduling convenient delivery dates, it's simply the next logical step. That gleeful exclamation, "It's a boy!" or "It's a girl!" may soon just be a quaint reminder of how random births used to be.
Throughout history, humans have wished for a child of one sex or the other and have been willing to do just about anything to get it. Now that gender selection is scientifically feasible, interest in the controversial practice (banned, except for medical reasons, in the United Kingdom) is exploding. Despite considerable moral murkiness, Americans are talking to their doctors and visiting catchy Web sites like www.choosethesexofyourbaby.com and myboyorgirl.com—many of them offering money-back guarantees. In just the last six months, Steinberg's site has had 85,000 hits. At the Genetics and IVF Institute (GIVF) in Fairfax, Va., an FDA clinical trial of a sophisticated sperm-sorting technology called MicroSort is more than halfway to completion. Through radio, newspaper and magazine ads ("Do you want to choose the gender of your next baby?"), the clinic has recruited hundreds of eager couples, and more than 400 babies out of 750 needed for the trial have been born. Other couples continue to flock to older, more low-tech and questionable sperm-sorting techniques like the Ericsson method, which is offered at about two dozen clinics nationwide. By far, the most provocative gender-selection technique is PGD. Some clinics offer the procedure as a bonus for couples already going th
|
"Fides et Ratio" |
|
report to moderator
|
|
|
Lainey
TGAT
    

USA

Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: May 18 2002
Status: offline
Administrator |
Posted - January 19 2004 : 12:51:21 AM
|
The Daughterless Nations
quote: No Girls, Please
In parts of Asia, sexism is ingrained and gender selection often means murder Most Chinese infants up for adoption are female, like Chloe Lian Ondracek, who was brought to the United States in 1997 by Jim and Pam Ondracek.
By Mary Carmichael
NewsweekJan. 26 issue - For years Rukmini Devi helped Indian couples in the impoverished state of Bihar choose the sex of their children. But in her decades of work, she never once used PGD. Bihar has few ultrasound machines and fewer fertility labs; many of its towns lack even basic health clinics, and most couples don't know their children's gender before birth. But boys are a treasured commodity in Bihar, and if a couple can't choose a child's sex prenatally, they can see a dai like Devi. For 80 cents, says Devi, who is now retired, a dai will help a woman give birth. For 80 cents more, she will take a newborn girl, hold her upside down by the waist and "give a sharp jerk," snapping the spinal cord. She will then declare the infant stillborn. "Many couples insist that we get rid of the baby girl at birth," Devi says. "What can we do?" It is a question health officials in parts of Asia have been struggling to answer for years. Like most European countries, India, China and South Korea have banned sex selection in any form. High-tech sperm sorting and PGD are just too complex and expensive to catch on in poor areas, even as black-market operations. But the abortion of female fetuses persists—and where it is not available, infanticide takes its place. The cultural bias stems largely from the need for strong boys to do farm labor, but the problem is not limited to poor, rural areas. In prosperous parts of India, clinics regularly identify and abort female fetuses using the same technologies—ultrasound and amniocentesis—they might employ to ensure fetal health. Korean doctors also use ultrasound to detect gender. Under national law they should be jailed, but since the law was made in the 1980s, only about 30 doctors have lost their licenses. Meanwhile experts estimate that 30,000 Korean female fetuses are aborted annually. As a result, the ratio of infant boys to girls is far off balance. Worldwide, 106 boys are born for every 100 girls—but in Korea, it's 110 to 100. Among fourth-born children, it's an astonishing 168 to 100. In China, statistics are unreliable—some village lists leave out girls entirely—but the last census logged 119 boys per 100 girls, and most Chinese infants up for adoption are female. In India, the ratio is closer to normal but would likely be higher if more rural families had access to ultrasound. In wealthy Haryana, where clinics flourish, there are 114 boys for every 100 girls.
Needless to say, the numbers infuriate the countries' health officials. All three nations have Westernized their economies to some degree, and they yearn to be seen in the same light as European countries, where cultural distaste for gender selection (not to mention selective abortion) has made it possible to successfully ban the practice. More pressingly, says Indian Health Minister Sushma Swaraj, if men continue to condone female feticide and infanticide, there won't be enough women for them to marry. A large class of young single men in China has already emerged; they may be responsible for rising crime and instability in the provinces. To combat the specter of what Swaraj calls "a daughterless nation," Asian governments may have to create new incentives instead of trying and failing to enforce the bans currently on the books. In China's Huaiyuan County, a pilot program gives parents of girls tax breaks and $240 in cash. "After two years of this campaign, we have achieved remarkable results," a local o |
"Fides et Ratio" |
report to moderator  |
|
|
SgtMunro
Soldier of the King
    
  

USA

Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: September 23 2002
Status: offline
Donating Member |
Posted - January 19 2004 : 09:57:42 AM
|
You're right, Lainey, this is a very disturbing trend. As a father of three girls, I cannot see how anyone would want to throw away a child for any reason, especially for something like gender. Life is supposed to be a precious gift, and if I might say, a somewhat 'random' experience.
Your Most Humble Servant,
|
Serjeant-Major Duncan Munro Capt. Thos. Graham's Coy. 42nd Royal Highland Regiment of Foote (The Black Sheep of the Black Watch)
"Nemo Me Impune Lacessit" -Or- "Recruit locally, fight globally." |
report to moderator  |
|
|
securemann
Deerslayer
    

USA

Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: July 08 2002
Status: offline
|
Posted - January 19 2004 : 4:16:19 PM
|
| Let me get this straight: Pro-Choice means a woman's right to choose which means complete freedom of her body and liberation of the woman.So this is total FREEDOM for the woman.Now according to these articles,pro-choice means to choose the female person and destroy her and let the male's live.So total freedom and rights for females means to kill them at random and let the males go free.I guess that's why I have a bumper sticker that states: "EQUAL RIGHTS FOR UNBORN WOMEN". Oh yes,I also have daughter's and those articles make me want to puke. |
report to moderator  |
|
|
LittleOne
Pathfinder


Canada

Bumppo's Patron since [at least]: April 23 2004
Status: offline
|
Posted - April 24 2004 : 1:25:21 PM
|
I don't think choosing your babies sex is any good..a baby is supposed to be gods gift..the one thing in life thats made so perfectly and magically is another human life, it doesn't require machines or technology its been happening since the beginning of people..messing around with it, i don't think is such a good idea, I guess if you change one thing..it could harm other parts of the baby. In the ways of choosing a babies sex..i think its wrong..life is a gift, and everything is made for a reason. Parents should embrace that gift no matter what sex thier baby is. As long as its healthy and happy.
As for the other article..reading it makes me feel sick..makes me realise what a sad selfish kinda vain world we live in..its all together really sad.. I wish instead of killing a few of those baby girls..when i get older I would like to adopt or open a center where they can be cared for..those poor babies. |
~Sincerely yours, the littleOne "Tetanktitit" |
report to moderator  |
|
| |
Topic  |
|
|
|
| The Mohican Board! [Bumppo's Redux!] |
© 1997-2025 - Mohican Press |
 |
|
| Current Mohicanland page raised in 0.31 seconds |
 |
|