Posted by Richard Solinski on April 10, 2000 at 16:11:32:
I know this must be the millionth input on the battle but I must add my opinions. For number one, the utilization of the Gatling guns (if they were brought up in the first place would have done Custer's Command little good). However I believe if Reno could have had them on the hill after his withdrawl He could have applied some damage to the pursuers. Although the 45/70 is scoffed at in light of .223, 7.62 Natos and 06s when used (elevated) properly it has quite an effective range. Back to Custer and his Men (45/55 Carbines and 1873 US Army colts for the most part). It appears that when the size of the encampment became clear it was already too late. Companys split and formed skirmish lines probably at first in good order and under the heat of battle it is difficult to imagine the troopers setting sights carefully as if on a rifle range. The amount of Siuox and others, arrows, repeaters and whatever must have been devastating. You really can't blame Reno, any further into his charge would have had the same results as Custer's foray. The hows and whys of the lack of coordination and timing will probably remain a qustion for us forever.
Of course a little more recon and a little less "devil may care" bravado would have given all more time to wait for General Terry.
In that case there may never have been The Last Stand!
On the opposite side, it was the Indians finest hour! tired of being pushed around and pursued they did what they had to do - now its all history.
Thanks for listening