Re: Thomasine/Thomas...clothes make the (wo)man

Posted by Goody Sandy on January 11, 2000 at 12:12:20:

In Reply to: Re: Thomasine/Thomas...clothes make the (wo)man posted by Myrrh on January 11, 2000 at 10:50:54:

: Here-here, Danalee.
: And thanks for that intriguing piece, Sandy!

: Myrrh

Hi Danalee:

I second Myrrh�s here-here! (You're welcome Myrrh.)

It�s distressing to know that some people are still so prudish about gender-related issues such as gender-reassignment surgery. The members of the General Court were courageous to rule in favor of Hall�s own definition of self, a ruling which no doubt raised more than a few eyebrows in 17th-century Virginia. Seems like we haven�t progressed very far, if at all, in the last three hundred and seventy odd years in regards to gender issues.

Best wishes,
Goody Sandy

Follow Ups:

• Re: Thomasine/Thomas...clothes make the (wo)man Danalee Lavelle-Burroughs 15:22:42 1/11/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: : Here-here, Danalee.
: : And thanks for that intriguing piece, Sandy!

: : Myrrh

: 
: Hi Danalee:

: I second Myrrh�s here-here!  (You're welcome Myrrh.)

: It�s distressing to know that some people are still so prudish about gender-related issues such as gender-reassignment surgery.  The members of the General Court were courageous to rule in favor of Hall�s own definition of self, a ruling which no doubt raised more than a few eyebrows in 17th-century Virginia.  Seems like we haven�t progressed very far, if at all, in the last three hundred and seventy odd years in regards to gender issues.

: Best wishes,
: Goody Sandy


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: