The Fort: To Be or Not To Be (left standing, that is)

Posted by Marcia on August 01, 1998 at 21:00:57:

In Reply to: Re: Irony posted by Jo on August 01, 1998 at 20:44:32:

I believe it is often in contracts between film makers & property owners that the property used must be returned (as near as possible) to the condition it was in before filming. Maybe this is why the fort was destroyed. Sounds like something Rich or Susan Houck might know! What about it guys?

MMMM

Follow Ups:

• Re: The Fort: To Be or Not To Be (left standing, that is) SusanH 09:45:28 8/02/98 (3)
  • Re: The Fort: To Be or Not To Be (left standing, that is) ann 11:32:23 8/02/98 (2)
    • Re: The Fort: To Be or Not To Be (left standing, that is) SusanH 20:00:27 8/02/98 (0)
    • Site Locations Marcia 12:40:27 8/02/98 (0)

Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: I believe it is often in contracts between film makers & property owners that the property used must be returned (as near as possible) to the condition it was in before filming.  Maybe this is why the fort was destroyed.  Sounds like something Rich or Susan Houck might know!  What about it guys?  

: MMMM


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: