Against All Odds Message Board
Against All Odds Message Board
11/23/2024 11:36:25 PM
Home | Old Board Archives | Events | Polls
Photo Album | Classifieds | Downloads
Profile | Register | Members | Private Messages | Search | Posting Tips | FAQ | Web Links | Chat
Bookmarks | Active Topics
Invite A Friend To Face The Odds!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Battle of the Little Bighorn - 1876
 Custer's Last Stand
 Massacre or Battle
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page

Author Previous Topic: Fleeing Troopers Topic Next Topic: Custer for the ordinary guy
Page: of 2

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - October 23 2007 :  5:21:27 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I believe that Brent has settled this difficult issue comfortably as possible. Scalped makes a valid point when he stated that every side committed atrocities. However, the Japanese soldier's perception of his racial superiority and commitment to death before surrender rendered them killers par excellence!
While the rogue's galley of man's inhumanity to man is abundant with prime candidates, the Japanese war machine and the Nazi Gestapo run neck to neck.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Brent
Lt. Colonel


USA
Status: offline

Posted - December 23 2007 :  12:37:30 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
On the subject of massacres, just read a pretty good book on the Dade "massacre" which took place on December 28, 1835 and precipitated the Second Seminole War. Actually it wasn't a massacre at all, but a well planned ambush of Major Dade and 108 men who were on a poorly planned and ill advised relief expedition to Ft King. It's a classic example of ignorance of the terrain, overconfidence, and underestimation of the enemy (sound familiar??)
The book is called 'Dade's Last Command" and written by Frank Laumer. Published 1995 by the University Press of Florida. 285 pages.
It has a lot of detail about military uniforms, food, the Seminoles, etc so it can be a bit "slow" reading at times. But all that research makes the actual battle narrative fascinating. A good read!!
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

chasber
Private

Status: offline

Posted - December 29 2007 :  3:44:23 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The majority of wounds suffered in battle do not result in immediate death. While the the battle does not fit the definition set forth for a massacre, what happened to the scores of wounded most certainly does. They were no longer a threat, they could not defend themselves and still they were put to a gruesome death. One cannot fault the Indians for this. When you go into someones country and pick a fight with them, you fight on their terms. But cultural differences aside, Custer's wounded, probably the majority of the men who rode with him, were massacred.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

AZ Ranger
Brigadier General


USA
Status: offline

Posted - December 30 2007 :  09:44:08 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
What it does effect is how you deal with the people during the time frame of the occurances. Hindsight treats a people kinder than when you just find out one of your relatives was tortured etc.

“ An officer's first duty is to his horses.”

SEMPER FI
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic: Fleeing Troopers Topic Next Topic: Custer for the ordinary guy  
Previous Page
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:
 
Custom Search

Against All Odds Message Board © 1998-2010 Rich Federici/Mohican Press Go To Top Of Page
This page was raised in 0.06 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.03