Against All Odds Message Board
Against All Odds Message Board
11/21/2024 11:38:26 PM
Home | Old Board Archives | Events | Polls
Photo Album | Classifieds | Downloads
Profile | Register | Members | Private Messages | Search | Posting Tips | FAQ | Web Links | Chat
Bookmarks | Active Topics
Invite A Friend To Face The Odds!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Battle of the Little Bighorn - 1876
 Sioux War of 1876-1877
 the Sioux and Gatlin gun
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic

Author Previous Topic: Why stop with Fetterman? Topic Next Topic: atlas of sioux wars  

Girl from Europe
Recruit

Status: offline

Posted - November 23 2004 :  9:47:37 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Did the Sioux warriors were familiar with Gatlin-gun ?

Why every regiment and every fort in the West wasn't armed with at least 5-6 Gatlin guns ?

Jan

Anonymous Poster8169
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - November 23 2004 :  10:34:34 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote

Gatling guns weren't very ideal for Indian campaigning. If fighting Indians, you'll always be on the move, and Gatlings were a drag on the march. They were used occasionally, but I can't think of one battle where they had an impact. If you must drag along a piece of machinery to fight Indians, a howitzer makes more sense, since it has longer range (and a bigger noise). Howitzers were used effectively against the Nez Perce, and against the Sioux at places like Killdeer Mountain.

R. Larsen

Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joseph wiggs
Brigadier General


Status: offline

Posted - November 28 2004 :  8:20:24 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Gatling Guns were invented in 1861 and, by the time of LBH battle, had improved very little. They often malfunctioned and were only effective in mass attacks, something Indian warriors were not inclined to do. Each gun was mounted on wheels so high off the ground that the gunners had to stand erect. This, of course, would have made them easy targets. We know that Gen. Terry transported these guns from Fort Lincoln to the Little Big Horn. Quite often, the horses that pulled them had to be un-harnessed while soldiers pushed and toted these weapons up hills and across ditches.

In battles where gorilla tactics were the norm (Plains Indian Wars) they were useless.
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

Frank Spencer
Private

Status: offline

Posted - February 21 2005 :  3:34:54 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Poll - Would Frank Spencer have handled the Little Big Horn better than Custer?

A. YES
B. NO
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page

joe wiggs
Brigadier General


USA
Status: offline

Posted - May 25 2008 :  5:33:17 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
After Lo these many years, I must answer in the negative. By the way, who in the hell is Frank Spencer?
Go to Bottom of PageGo to Top of Page
  Previous Topic: Why stop with Fetterman? Topic Next Topic: atlas of sioux wars  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:
 
Custom Search

Against All Odds Message Board © 1998-2010 Rich Federici/Mohican Press Go To Top Of Page
This page was raised in 0.06 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.03