| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| BJMarkland |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 04:36:11 AM
This is an open mail to all the readers of the LBH threads.
Warlord, just so you cannot state that I went behind your back, I wish you to know that I have written Rich and requested that something, up to his discretion, be done to curb your juvenile antics.
While you sometimes have very fine takes on situations (witness the clear and lucid explanation of .45-55 vs. .45-70), the name-calling, slander, and borderline obscenities cannot be tolerated by me any longer. I have tried to reason with you privately and had no success. Thus, it came down to me reporting you and requesting action. Whether action occurs and you remain on the board and begin contributing to the extent that you are capable of depends upon you.
The fact that you don't like DC and Larsen has been handled by you in a particularly childish way. First, neither really pay much attention to your slanders. Secondly, I imagine DC enjoys the fact that he raises your blood pressure. Obviously you are not impacting anyone but the remainder of us who read and contribute to this board for the pure enjoyment of the hobby we share. You have the capabilities to contribute to our understanding as much as you want to. You just do not do it enough.
You have begun calling Larsen a racist. Since Larsen understands your motive, I will address it briefly. If you have read the posts in these threads long enough, you will understand that Larsen has been the most vocal advocate of including the Indian accounts into the larger LBH picture but he is not afraid to point out contradictions within their accounts. If that makes someone a racist, well, include me in the picture. Racist my asinine!
You know, when I began on this board, I envisioned learning new things, sharing ideas/concepts/theories, arguing about same, and thinking that this might be a place for a high school or college students looking for ideas about LBH or the Indian Wars to gain understanding. I still have that faith. That is why I have taken the step I have in regards to you.
With the best of wishes,
Billy
|
| 10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| BJMarkland |
Posted - December 03 2004 : 05:59:30 AM
I hear and obey oh Great Leader! I will be a nice boy from now on. 
Merry Christmas,
Billy |
| Rich |
Posted - December 03 2004 : 05:22:10 AM
OK lads ... enough is enough ...
This is not about how active or inactive this place is now or may have been in the past ...
It is not about difference of opinion or heated discussion ...
No ... it is about common decency & personal dignity. Everyone here obviously has a common interest. Share in that common interest. Enjoy the company of others who are willing to engage in discussion. Face it, most of us can't bring this topic up at the dinner table, workplace, or local sports bar and seriously engage. Here one can.
Don't ruin it.
Further "conversation" along these lines will require further action. Please act in an adult manner.
Thank you! |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 11:18:38 PM
[MESSAGE DELETED BY REQUEST] |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 11:00:02 PM
[MESSAGE DELETED BY REQUEST] |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 10:48:33 PM
[MESSAGE DELETED BY REQUEST] |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 10:46:25 PM
[MESSAGE DELETED BY REQUEST] |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 10:38:32 PM
[MESSAGE DELETED BY REQUEST] |
| BJMarkland |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 10:22:18 PM
I am sitting here trying to decide whether I should laugh or simply cry about WL's obtuseness.
Since laughter is the best medicine, I have decided to take it as his exercise in "pushing the envelope" of humor.
OK peanut brain, let's go over some of the more obvious lies and half-truths.
"Ah Good: Now you are out in the open for a change BJ! I like that!"
Glad you do. I have never been in the closet. Since I respect private email, until I have your permission, I will not quote from my email to you regarding your conduct or your answers. Legally, you can quote to your heart's content, ethically, well, let us just say that it follows your normal pattern of behavior.
"First, BJ you say the only person you want to respect you is your daughter! You don't care about anyone else! That is rather apparent here! I suspect this could be a real issue with you as you seem to have a hard time obtaining anyone's respect including mine by your " I'm going to tell the teacher immature behavior." BJ grow up!"
I stand by the first statement from my private mail to you. Since you don't know me nor mine, I am positive you are reconning by fire on the second statement hoping to make a hit. WL, you are as much a marksman in argument as the 7th Cav. troopers at LBH were in battle. "Grow up"??? You have got to be kidding. Let us recap some of the more courteous WLisms:
"****: You should be flattered anyone thinks you have a set! But maybe you are deformed like your hero, Hitler!!!"
"Anonymous Poster8169: ...You are a racist indian hater!!!"
The above two came from the MTC: Basic Theories thread.
This one is just too good to fore go posting in it's entirety:
"Anonymous Poster8169: Up to your usual B.S. over here to, huh! Two how do you know"s and one Do you have any evidence? Same old bullcrap! Ask for citations and then try denegrate them to build up your little ego at someone else's expense! There really are people here who would like to discuss these incidents without you and the troll trying to monopolize the board with your asinine non-linear logic, foolish assumptions designed to irritate and your prejudice against the indians! Why don't you go back to your white power messageboard where you probably came from!"
Ho boy, Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle. "...trying to monopolize the board with your asinine non-linear logic, foolish assumptions designed to irritate and your prejudice against the indians!" I am amazed you were able to type that with a straight face.
The above was from Weir Point-Before and After, posted on 11/30/2004 @ 12:02:48
The below special WLisms come from the Bhist on the History Channel thread:
"Troll: Can't read, can't talk, can't walk, sho don't know wa I'm at!!! Pass me anoda drink!!Where am I Mister Dillon? Pass the bota".
"9/62 is not half way through dum, dum! Rifle drill?"
This all-time classic of two-faced typing is from Benteen's Order 12/01/04 @ 01:54:43
"Anonymous Poster8169: First, I do not lie, nor do I have to post lies unlike you!"
Oh well, enough of the fun stuff, back to business.
"When I discovered some of the static stagnantion and large domination of this messageboard by a few people I wondered if some change might be possible. I particulary found offensive the way DC and Larsen talked down to people and probably more important a very superficial treatment of many issues here. So I joined the messageboard. As a few of you may have noticed I take little crap off anyone! There is nothing like a really bitter argument to bring out facts and outline the contestants! I do not apologize for that!
"
Exactly what depth, beyond seeing how far into the sewer you can drag us, have you brought to the board dear sir?
"As time went on and some of the arguments on ocassion became more personal and acrimoneous I decided to see how far I could push the envelope by the language I used.<snip>...I found describing offensive people in the mid-range of glowing metaphors was fair game and apparently free speech here. Great! Each time I did this I had expected a heavy dressing down from Rich! It did not happen."
So you admit to being a troll?
"Mid-range of glowing metaphors."? For crying out loud, my 9 year old could come up with more creative insults than you have! Face it WL, you are simply trolling for a response to give meaning to your pitiful excuse of a life. If they talk to you, you think, this validates your existence.
"About this same time I noticed a lot more people reading the messageboard discussion's. I of course, cannot take all the credit for that, but I also believe I sure as hell am adding more interest to it than you are BJ! " Well WL, if the only way I can add interest to anything is to engage in untruths, innuendo, slurs and incorrect "facts", then I will continue to be boring old Billy. I suspect that if more people are reading the board due to your posts, it is simply a characteristic of the same sick fascination that we observe the scene of a automobile accident in which someone is critically injured or even killed. Conversely, they just may be hoping to be surprised and read something halfway resembling sense posted under your name.
"They did not want to do anything about it or come back and engage in higher level engagements!!! And guess what BJ they did not want to make complaints to Rich! So if they did not want to contribute, what was the point!" So, as you say, what is the point? I don't influence their actions nor wish to. They ran from escalated conflict rather than trying to work it out (and I might add that each coin has two sides, perhaps you might get both sides before you assign guilt/responsibility).
As far as your actions go, I tolerated them at first and tried to reason with you. As reasoning did not work, I decided to go to the next level.
"I have had a number of boardmembers send me messages of congratulations and encouragement! They have told me to keep up the good work! SHOCK, huh!" Are these the "board members" that you claim to represent? I can't go into more detail as I will be divulging information from your private mail to me. Needless to say, why not post a few with the names redacted to protect the parties. Wait, your integrity in my books is too low to trust you with such a responsibility so I guess we will have to live without the statements of these "board members". And to be quite honest with you, which I have always been, someone who lurks and applauds your behavior in secret but is too chicken-**** to state their views in black and white to the board as a whole deserves no respect.
"BJ, I would wonder if Rich only wants one of your low caliber, to provide the rather childish oppoisiton you do? You would like to stand up, but do not have the guts!"
Wow, you know a lot about both Rich and I. Since I haven't heard different, I will continue to post to the board whenever I wish. If Rich wants otherwise, fine, it is his sandbox and I follow his rules. As far as you knowing my character! Lord, WL, you are such an idiot child that it makes me shudder to think you were actually in the military. As far as standing up, well, you have these two public posts as well as one or two others plus private communications, all addressed to you about your behavior. Exactly what am I not standing up to? Oh, let me guess: DC and Larsen. Well, since they both can defend themselves much better I, I will let them provide rebuttals to you.
You are really so dense that you don't get it do you? I have no problems with arguing facts or interpretations of the facts. Presentation of erroneous data, slurs, no sourcing, half-truths or personal attacks because of who they are have no place on a board devoted to history.
Best of wishes,
Billy
NOTE: The misspellings encountered in quotations from WL's works are his alone and are in the original document that they were copied from.
|
| Dark Cloud |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 3:43:02 PM
I have no particular issue here, exccept that I'd like to point out that this original forum started, it looks like, in 1999 and ended in 2001, when it moved to these new digs. The entire production of that forum for three years can be held on one page, or is currently. That was all topics, not just Custer.
Custer is the only topic that generates any interest here, let's be blunt. And there wasn't much happening when I started posting here. Lorendead was offering up contests of recondite trivia. If it were me driving people away, you have to deal with that: zero vs. over 3000. Further, I don't think people do go away, they just change ID's. In any event, they reappear at random.
I'd also suggest the forum isn't just about socialization of the participants but about the people under discussion, who are owed honest appraisal. I don't like romantic claptrap, grown men playing soldier and somehow expecting honor as a soldier, or the willing surrender of thought to those who claim the shield of 'science.' And I say so. We disagree about a lot of stuff but I think it important about how we view our country and what we build on. |
| bhist |
Posted - December 02 2004 : 2:49:26 PM
I stand behind you Billy, 100%.
I have also come under attack by Warlord, and I'll never understand why. I don't think I've ever attacked anyone on this board outside the proper debate rules. Yet, Warlord has libeled me countless times.
If Warlord is correct that some people can't stand D.C. and/or Larsen posting here (I'm not one of them), and if Warlord seems to believe he has to protect posters from D.C. and Larsen, then he has defeated his purpose and become worse than the people he despises. If Warlord can't see that, he must realize that the majority of people posting here long long before he came upon the scene perceive it to be so.
I know Rich has plenty to think about with what needs to be done about Warlord and until he does, I expect Warlord to either refrain from personal attacks and name calling or stop posting all together.
|
|
|
